Open Education as a threshold concept in Teacher Education: a theoretical framework for further rese Members : #OER18

Group Admins

Public Group Active 6 years ago

Thu, Apr 19 2018, 12:05pm – 1:05pm

Authors: Gemma Tur, and Victoria I. Marín

Room: Cinema 3

Theme: Open and Learners

Type: Presentation

Description

Threshold concept framework

A threshold concept can be considered as akin to a portal, opening up a new and previously inaccessible way of thinking about something. It represents a transformed way of understanding, or interpreting, or viewing something without which the learner cannot progress. As a consequence of comprehending a threshold concept there may thus be a transformed internal view of subject matter, subject landscape, or even worldview (Meyer and Land, 2003). Threshold concepts have been explored in many disciplines (Bradbeer, 2006) and may have a key role for the transformation of the students’ learning experience (Cousin, 2006). Since open education has implications for innovation and change (Peter and Deimann, 2013), we suggest exploring it as a threshold concept.

There are five main attributes defined originally by Meyer and Land (2003) and three more have also been listed stemming from comments made by the authors (UCL, 2013): transformative, troublesome, irreversible, integrative, bounded, discursive, reconstitutive and liminal.

Openness as a threshold concept

1. Transformative

Is openness transformative for students involved in open educational practices?

2. Troublesome

What difficulties do students face when being involved in open educational practices?

3. Irreversible

How do students’ perceptions change when being involved in open educational practices? How do these changes impact visions of their own future professional careers?

4. Liminality

How can the progressive change towards the open movement be scaffolded? How can feedback help in the construction of authentic open educational practices?

5. Discursive

What kind of narrative do students involved in open educational practices develop? Does it reflect authentic construction of the open movement understanding?

This is the theoretical framework for future research about openness as a threshold concept. More research is needed to obtain data that would throw light on how to address each particular attribute. This is an open call to those interested in going further in this line of research.

References

Bradbeer, J. (2006). Threshold concepts within the disciplines: a report on a symposium at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.11120/plan.2006.00170016?src=recsys

Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet Special Issue on Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, 17, 4-5. Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.11120/plan.2006.00170004

Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses. Occasional Report 4. Available at https://www.colorado.edu/ftep/sites/default/files/attached-files/meyer_and_land_-_threshold_concepts.pdf

Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: a historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23

UCL Department Of Electronic And Electrical Engineering (2015). Threshold Concepts: Undergraduate Teaching, Postgraduate Training and Professional Development. A short introduction and bibliography. Available at http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/~mflanaga/thresholds.html

Go Back